VIDEO: Michelle Grattan on the next sitting week - and Scott Morrison's relationship with Trump

University of Canberra Vice-Chancellor Professor Deep Saini discusses the week in politics with Michelle Grattan – one with a reduced pace, despite the 24 hour news cycle. They talk about whethe...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Ministers fiddle while buildings crack and burn

The Building Ministers’ Forum (BMF) met yesterday yet again to discuss implementing the February 2018 Shergold-Weir Report they commissioned in mid-2017. The BMF is responsible for overseeing t...

Geoff Hanmer, Adjunct Lecturer in Architecture, UNSW - avatar Geoff Hanmer, Adjunct Lecturer in Architecture, UNSW

Why is nursing home food so bad? Some spend just $6.08 per person a day – that's lower than prison

If residents are given poor quality foods that don't meet their needs or preferences, they're less likely to eat it. ShutterstockThe Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety this week turned...

Cherie Hugo, Teaching Fellow, Nutrition & Dietetics, Bond University - avatar Cherie Hugo, Teaching Fellow, Nutrition & Dietetics, Bond University

What's not to like? Instagram's trial to hide the number of 'likes' could save users' self-esteem

Not enough likes? Not a nice feeling.Shutterstock.comInstagram is running a social media experiment in Australia and elsewhere to see what happens when it hides the number of likes on photos and other...

Joanne Orlando, Researcher: Children and Technology, Western Sydney University - avatar Joanne Orlando, Researcher: Children and Technology, Western Sydney University

The waterwheel plant is a carnivorous, underwater snap-trap

The whaterwheel plant can snap up its prey in milliseconds.The ConversationSign up to the Beating Around the Bush newsletter here, and suggest a plant we should cover at batb@theconversation.edu.au.Bi...

Adam Cross, Research Fellow, Curtin University - avatar Adam Cross, Research Fellow, Curtin University

What's the next 'giant leap' for humankind in space? We asked 3 space experts

Today, we're asking two astrophysicists and a planetary scientist: what's the likelihood we'll be living on Mars or the Moon in future?Pixabay/WikiImages, CC BYYou’ve probably heard that this we...

Sunanda Creagh, Head of Digital Storytelling - avatar Sunanda Creagh, Head of Digital Storytelling

It's a new era for Australia's whistleblowers – in the private sector

Whistleblowing will always take some type of toll, but it need not be career suicide.www.shutterstock.comAs strange as it might sound, whistleblowers in Australia have reason to rejoice – so lon...

Dennis Gentilin, Adjunct Fellow, Macquarie University - avatar Dennis Gentilin, Adjunct Fellow, Macquarie University

Explainer: what is leptospirosis and how can it harm us and our pets?

When a game of fetch can harm: leptospirosis can be transmitted to dogs (and humans) from stagnant water contaminated with rat urine.from www.shutterstock.comRecently reported cases of the often fatal...

Christine Griebsch, Specialist and Senior Lecturer in Small Animal Medicine, University Veterinary Teaching Hospital Sydney, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney - avatar Christine Griebsch, Specialist and Senior Lecturer in Small Animal Medicine, University Veterinary Teaching Hospital Sydney, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney

Smokey (the) Bear is still keeping his watchful eye on America's forests after 75 years on the job

The PSA star, deployed in the wildJoseph Sohm/Shutterstock.com Smokey Bear turns 75 on Aug. 9. The star of the longest-running public-service advertising campaign in U.S. history is now big on social ...

Wendy Melillo, Associate Professor, American University School of Communication - avatar Wendy Melillo, Associate Professor, American University School of Communication

What Amazon's decision to retrain a third of its employees means for the future of work

Amazon’s announcement that it will invest US$700 million to retrain 100,000 employees – a third of its U.S. workforce – in new technologies is the latest reminder that the much-heral...

Scott F. Latham, Associate Professor of Strategic Management, University of Massachusetts Lowell - avatar Scott F. Latham, Associate Professor of Strategic Management, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Why do birds sing?

A male Olive-backed Euphonia (_Euphonia gouldi_), photographed in Costa Rica.Andy Morffew, CC BYCurious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to ...

David Steadman, Curator of Ornithology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida - avatar David Steadman, Curator of Ornithology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida

Yes, I'm searching for aliens – and no, I won't be going to Area 51 to look for them

A Sept. 20 citizen "raid" on Area 51, a secretive military installation long fancied to hold alien remains, has drawn worldwide interest.Fer Gregory/Shutterstock.comEditor’s note: What started a...

Jason Wright, Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University - avatar Jason Wright, Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University

Brain-machine interfaces are getting better and better – and Neuralink's new brain implant pushes the pace

Existing BMIs focus on restoring function for people with mobility or communication issues.UPMC/Pitt Health Sciences, CC BY-NC-NDElon Musk grabbed a lotof attention with his July 16 announcement that ...

Robert Gaunt, Assistant Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh - avatar Robert Gaunt, Assistant Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh

Are Syrian refugees a danger to the West?

A Syrian family loads their belongings as they evacuate an informal refugee camp in Deir Al-Ahmar, east Lebanon, June 9, 2019. AP/Hussein MallaWhile today’s news is full of stories about refugee...

Arie Kruglanski, Professor of Psychology, University of Maryland - avatar Arie Kruglanski, Professor of Psychology, University of Maryland

This is the first in a three-part mini-symposium on Wages, Unemployment and Underemployment presented by The Conversation and the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.

The long debate over the causes of wage stagnation took an unexpected turn last week, when Finance Minister Matthias Cormann described (downward) flexibility in the rate of wage growth as “a deliberate design feature of our economic architecture”.

It was a position that was endorsed in a flurry of confusion 16 seconds after it had been rejected by Defence Industry Minister Linda Reynolds.

Cormann had said policies aimed at pushing wages up could cause “massive spikes in unemployment”.

The ease with which Reynolds was trapped into at first rejecting and then accepting what her ministerial colleague had said flowed from the fact that Cormann had broken one of the standing conventions of politics in Australia, and for that matter, the English-speaking world.

For more than forty years, both the architecture of labour market regulation and the discretionary choices of governments have been designed with the precise objective of holding wages down.

These policies have been quite successful, as can be seen from the graph.

However, at least until recently, there has been bipartisan agreement on at least one aspect of them – that no one should mention their role in holding back wages.

ABS Australian Accounts, seasonally adjusted Instead, the decline in the wage share of national income has been variously blamed on technology immigration imports from China and, more recently, the end of the mining boom. None of these explanations stand up to scrutiny. The idea that technology is driving the wage share down is perhaps the most popular. But technological change has been continuous, if uneven, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century. Most of the time, workers have shared in the resulting productivity gains. There have however, been a number of exceptional periods in which workers have been harmed. They have been times when the balance of power had favoured employers. At those unusual times, any kind of disruption, whether caused by new technology or not, has had the potential to enable employers to break working conditions and cut wages. Right now, for example, there is no necessary reason for the ability to do business over the Internet to harm workers. In many ways it empowers workers by reducing the information advantages of big employers. But in an environment where unions are weak and working conditions are vulnerable to erosion, the outcome is firms like Airtasker, where workers bid against each other to perform outsourced tasks, often for less than the minimum wage. There is nothing new about this kind of working arrangement. It could be seen outside the wharves on Sydney’s “Hungry Mile” in the 1930s, where workers went from wharf to wharf each day hoping for work, or today on street corners in the United States, where (often undocumented) construction workers gather in the mornings hoping to be picked for work. But if technology isn’t to blame, what is? The real story begins in the early 1970s, when there was an upsurge in inflation associated with the breakdown of the post-war Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates , and soaring prices in commodity markets including that for oil. The result was a “wage-price spiral” as both wages and prices rose at unexpected annual rates of more than 10%. In a nation with a history of strong trade unions, decades of full employment, and the boundless faith in the future forged by the 1960s, wages grew faster than prices as both spiralled upwards. By the time rising unemployment began to bite, and inflation slowed down, the wage share of national income had risen to an unprecedented 62%. Reining in this “real wage overhang” became the central preoccupation of macroeconomic policy throughout the 1970s and 1980s. This made sense at the time. But, as in other fields, ideas formed in the 1970s and 1980s continued to dominate the thinking of policymakers long after they had either been proven to be failures or rendered obsolete by changing circumstances, as was the case with policies designed to hold back wages. The policies had several elements. There were a series of changes in industrial relations law, most of which have attacked unions and weakened the bargaining power of labour. The Fraser government introduced Sections 45D and 45E of the Trade Practices Act banning secondary boycotts, that is, action in solidarity with other workers. Fraser also created the Industrial Relations Bureau, the first of a series of industrial “police forces”. On its election in 1996, the Howard government introduced the Workplace Relations Act 1996 which extended scope for non-union agreements. After winning a Senate majority in 2004, Howard introduced WorkChoices which limited the scope of collective bargaining, and wound back protections against dismissal. Read more: Explainer: what are the ABCC and Registered Organisations bills? The Industrial Relations Bureau maintained at least a pretence of impartiality. By contrast, the organisations created by the Abbott and Turnbull governments (the Registered Organisations Commission and Australian Building and Construction Commission) have been so nakedly anti-union that they have repeatedly broken the law they are supposed to uphold. Labor governments have wound back some of the most extreme measures, but have not changed the general direction of policy. Even measures that appeared superficially favourable to workers turned out differently. For example, in 1993 the Keating government introduced the concept of “protected industrial action”. It was some time before it became apparent that the result was to abolish any general right to strike, something that exists in almost every other democratic government. As Minister for Workplace Relations, Bill Shorten introduced measures that were pitched as protecting penalty rates through a review process undertaken by the Fair Work Commission. A few years later, in a highly politicised process, the Commission used the process to cut penalty rates. Coalition governments have also used the power of the state directly against unions. Notable examples include the string of royal commissions created by the Abbott government and the use, in 1998, of ex-military strikebreakers to break the Maritime Union of Australia. Their training and deployment was facilitated by a government consultant who worked with the major waterfront employer, Patricks. orchestrating the offshore training of the replacement workforce through the actions of consultant Stephen Webster and other shadowy ex-military figures. Finally, macroeconomic management has operated on the basis that any increase in wages is a danger signal requiring a tightening of fiscal and monetary policy. A notable example, was the warning by then Employment Minister Eric Abetz in January 2014 months after taking office that Australia faced a “wages explosion”. ABS Wage Price Index Far from “exploding”, wage growth slid and hasn’t recovered. More striking than his failed prediction, was Abetz’ assumption, taken for granted in policy debate, that any substantial increase in wages would be disastrous. It is only in the last few years that this assumption, inherited from last century, have been challenged. The Reserve Bank in particular has become an advocate for higher wage growth. Yet as Cormann’s incautious outbreak of truthtelling has shown, the view has yet to percolate through to Australia’s elites. The Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia is one of Australia’s four learned academies. The ASSA coordinates the promotion of research, teaching and advice in the social sciences, promotes scholarly cooperation across disciplines, comments on national needs and priorities in the social sciences, and provides advice to government on issues of national importance.

Authors: The Conversation

Read more http://theconversation.com/ultra-low-wage-growth-isnt-accidental-it-is-the-intended-outcome-of-government-policies-113357