View from The Hill: Morrison's right hand man dispenses with niceties in lecturing big business

The Morrison government appears to be seething with anger at big business. At least, that’s the impression you get from a lecturing, hectoring speech delivered this week by Ben Morton, who&rsquo...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

New musical has enough warmth, witty lines and catchy tunes to win its own fangirls

Sharon Millerchip, Ayesha Madon, James Majoos, Chika Ikogwe, and Kimberley Hodgson in Fangirls at the Brisbane Festival. Photo: Stephen HenryComedy often succeeds where tragedy fails. Fangirls, the ...

Alastair Blanshard, Paul Eliadis Chair of Classics and Ancient History Deputy Head of School, The University of Queensland - avatar Alastair Blanshard, Paul Eliadis Chair of Classics and Ancient History Deputy Head of School, The University of Queensland

The Senate filibuster explained – and why it should be allowed to die

The filibuster is like a stoplight that's always red. AP Photo/J. Scott ApplewhiteSen. Elizabeth Warren is the latest Democrat to argue an arcane Senate rule governing debate stands in the way of pa...

Daniel Wirls, Professor of Politics, University of California, Santa Cruz - avatar Daniel Wirls, Professor of Politics, University of California, Santa Cruz

The bizarre social history of beds

For centuries, people thought nothing of crowding family members or friends into the same bed.miniwide/Shutterstock.com Groucho Marx once joked, “Anything that can’t be done in bed isn&rsq...

Brian Fagan, Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara - avatar Brian Fagan, Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara

Why Sikhs wear a turban and what it means to practice the faith in the United States

People participate in a candlelight vigil near the White House to protest violence against Sikhs in 2012.AP Photo/Susan WalshAn elderly Sikh gentleman in Northern California, 64-year-old Parmjit Singh...

Simran Jeet Singh, Henry R. Luce Post-Doctoral Fellow in Religion in International Affairs Post-Doctoral Fellow, New York University - avatar Simran Jeet Singh, Henry R. Luce Post-Doctoral Fellow in Religion in International Affairs Post-Doctoral Fellow, New York University

A newly designed vaccine may help stamp out remaining polio cases worldwide

The oral polio vaccine is most commonly used in the developing world, despite one big problem.CDC/Alan Janssen, MSPH, CC BYPublic health organizations around the world have been fighting for global er...

Patricia L. Foster, Professor Emerita of Biology, Indiana University - avatar Patricia L. Foster, Professor Emerita of Biology, Indiana University

Why carbon dioxide has such outsized influence on Earth's climate

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite makes precise measurements of Earth's carbon dioxide levels from space.NASA/JPLI am often asked how carbon dioxide can have an important effect on global clim...

Jason West, Professor of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - avatar Jason West, Professor of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

The womb isn't sterile – healthy babies are born with bacteria and fungi in their guts

New research suggests that a newborn is exposed to bacteria and fungi in the womb.stockce/ShutterstockFor the last hundred years, scientists have believed that humans develop in a womb that remains st...

Kent Willis, Assistant Professor of Neonatology, University of Tennessee - avatar Kent Willis, Assistant Professor of Neonatology, University of Tennessee

Anti-vaccination mothers have outsized voice on social media – pro-vaccination parents could make a difference

Vaccinations are important to protect against a host of diseases.www.shutterstock.comA high school student from Ohio made national headlines recently by getting inoculated despite his family’s a...

Brooke W. McKeever, Associate Professor, University of South Carolina - avatar Brooke W. McKeever, Associate Professor, University of South Carolina

How a person vapes, not just what a person vapes, could also play a big role in vaping harm

A smoking machine in the author's lab. Smoking by a machine is not the same as smoking by a person, the author and others have found.Katie DiFrancesco, CC BY-SAIn the wake of six deaths and 380 cases ...

Risa Robinson, Professor and Department Chair, Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology - avatar Risa Robinson, Professor and Department Chair, Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology

Why won't Democrats say they want government to solve problems?

They didn't come out and say what they really mean.AP Photo/Eric GayAll 10 Democratic candidates in the Houston debate Sept. 13 spoke about investing public money – taxpayer dollars – in e...

Jennifer Mercieca, Associate Professor of Communication, Texas A&M University - avatar Jennifer Mercieca, Associate Professor of Communication, Texas A&M University

Top Democrats discussed 'Medicare for All' at Houston debate, but what about healthy food for all?

The Democratic candidates discussed health care a lot – but not healthy food. AP Photo/David J. PhillipThe 10 Democrats who took the debate stage on Sept. 12 discussed many critical issues, from...

Patricia Smith, Professor of Economics, University of Michigan - avatar Patricia Smith, Professor of Economics, University of Michigan

Polycystic kidney disease, the most common genetic kidney disorder you've probably never heard of

If one parent has ADPKD, their child has a one in two chance of getting it.From shutterstock.comAutosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic kidney disorder, and the...

Karen Dwyer, Deputy Head, School of Medicine, Deakin University - avatar Karen Dwyer, Deputy Head, School of Medicine, Deakin University

VIDEO: Michelle Grattan on Gladys Liu and the government's plan to drug-test welfare recipients

Liberal MP Gladys Liu has beeb the centre of much heated debate in federal politics this week. AAP/Lukas CochMichelle Grattan speaks with University of Canberra Vice-Chancellor and President Professor...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Now it’s the Coalition that’s being accused of a “retiree tax”.

As interest rates have come down over the past four years, the rate that retirees are “deemed” to have earned for the purpose of the pension income test hasn’t budged, meaning that although retirees have been earning less (in some cases a good deal less), they haven’t been getting more access to the pension.

Depending on how you look at it, it’s either been making a mockery of the idea of an income test, or making the test more restrictive.

So how did it happen? Why is income “deemed” rather than actually measured when determining eligibility for government benefits, and is the system hopelessly compromised?

It’s important to understand what deeming is and where it came from if we are to understand the debate that will ensue when the government completes its review of the deeming rate in the next few weeks.

Where did deeming come from?

Modern day deeming was introduced by former prime minister Paul Keating in his final budget as treasuer in 1990.

As he explained in that budget speech:

many pensioners still disadvantage themselves by holding their savings in accounts that pay little or no interest

He was being diplomatic. It was widely believed that many retirees deliberately earned low rates on their savings in order to qualify for the pension or get a bigger pension. It cost the government money (while making the banks money) and it cost many of the pensioners money, because they lost more in interest than they gained in pension – although for those that used low earnings to ensure they at least got some pension, the associated benefits cards made it worth it.

From March 1991 cash and deposits were to assumed to be earning at least 10%, whatever they actually earned. If they earned more than 10% they were treated as earning more.

Except for the first A$2000. That was treated as earning only what it did, because many pensioners held small savings in low interest accounts for day to day purchases.

How has it changed?

Deeming is different today. It applies to more assets, including gold,managed investments, superannuation account-based income streams and listed shares; and it is used to assess eligibility for more benefits, including veterans and disability pensions.

And it’s no longer a win-win for the government. If someone earns more than the deeming rate, their income is assessed at only the deeming rate.

In the words of the department of human services:

if your investment return is higher than the deemed rates, the extra amount doesn’t count as your income

There are two rates: one for the first $51,800 of financial assets (for a couple, the first $86,200) which is currently 1.75%, and the other for those assets in excess of that amount, which is currently 3.25%.

The threshold climbs in line with the consumer price index each July.

(In its first budget in 2014 the Abbott government tried to cut the threshold to $30,000 for singles and $50,000 for couples but was thwarted by the Senate.)

We deem by whim…

But there’s nothing automatic about setting the rates. It’s up to the government (specifically the minister for families and social services) to adjust them, or not, as it sees fit.

Both the high and low deeming rate used to be below the Reserve Bank’s cash rate (with the low rate typically 1.5 to 2 percentage points below the high rate), but after the cash rate dived in 2016 they have been left above it, in the case of the low rate, for the first time ever.

The high deeming rates have meant applicants have been means tested on income they haven’t received.

Deeming rates versus RBA cash rate, 1996 - 2019, per cent

Australian government, RBA …leaving rates curiously out of whack Back when the deeming rates were lower relative to deposit rates, each of the big four banks offered “deeming accounts” that paid the deeming rates. Today none of them do. They are not allowed to call accounts deeming accounts unless they pay the deeming rate, so instead they have retitled them “retirement accounts”. The National Australia Bank’s retirement account (closed to new customers) pays just 0.20% for the first $10,000, well below the lowest deeming rate of 1.75%. The ANZ and the Commonwealth pay 0.25%. Westpac pays 0.3%. If you have more than $250,000 on deposit it pays 1.5% on the part above $250,000, which is still lower than the lowest of the two deeming rates. Read more: Why pensioners are cruising their way around budget changes Labor believes that not cutting deeming rates since 2015 has saved the government more than $1 billion per year in pension payments. It’s a significant portion of the $7.1 billion surplus it has forecast for 2019-20. That is probably why the government has said it will take its decision about rates to its expenditure review committee, in what amounts to an admission that those decisions have as much to do with government finances as they do with treating applicants for pensions fairly. There’s actually a case for extending deeming As unrealistic as deeming rates have become, there’s a case for extending their use. At the moment applicants for the pension face two means tests: one for assets and one for income. Both the Henry Tax Review and the Abbott government’s National Commission of Audit recommended replacing them with a “merged means test” of the kind Australia had up until the 1970s. Instead of an assets test, all assets would be deemed to earn a prudent rate of return; among them cars, holiday homes, investment properties, and high-value family homes. The Commission put the case this way: Exempting the principal residence from the means test is inequitable as it allows for high levels of wealth to be sheltered from means testing. For example, under current rules a single person who owns a $400,000 house and has $750,000 in shares ($1.15 million in total assets) would not be eligible for the pension, while a similar person with a principal residence worth $2 million and $100,000 in shares ($2.1 million in total assets) would be able to claim a pension at the full rate. It’s a worthwhile idea whose time might come, but it is unlikely to come while deeming rates are seen to be unfair and capriciously set. The government has an opportunity to restore confidence in deeming and pensions. The decisions it is about to make will show how important it thinks that is. Read more: Words that matter. What’s a franking credit? What’s dividend imputation? And what's 'retiree tax'?

Authors: The Conversation

Read more http://theconversation.com/deeming-rates-explained-what-is-deeming-how-does-it-cut-pensions-and-why-do-we-have-it-120089