The government is about to make an historic decision.

The JobSeeker unemployment benefit (previously called Newstart) has scarcely increased in real terms since 1994.

In that time general living standards, as measured by real gross domestic product per capita, have almost doubled, climbing 83%.

Other benefits such as the age pension have broadly kept pace with living standards. They climb in line with wages rather than the slower-growing consumer price index.

In dollar terms the single rate is now just A$565.70 per fortnight, close to the poverty line and well below the $860.60 paid to single pensioners. Back in the early 1990s it was close to the pension.

image Source: Ben Phillips ANU, DSS The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said in 2010 Newstart had fallen so low as to call into question its effectiveness in “enabling someone to look for a suitable job”. In March, as the scale of the looming job losses from coronavirus and the responses to it became clear, the government effectively doubled JobSeeker, boosting the $565.70 single payment and other lower payments by a $550 per fortnight coronavirus supplement in an acknowledgement that unemployed people “need to meet the costs of their groceries and other bills”. The increase took effect from April 27, but was temporary, for six months after it received royal assent, meaning it is due to expire in late September. Read more: What'll happen when the money's snatched back? Our looming coronavirus support cliff The economic statement due on Thursday will provide an opportunity for the government to cushion the blow by either extending the life of supplement or permanently lifting JobSeeker. It’ll also provide an opportunity for it to say no, allowing JobSeeker to collapse back to where it was. An increase suggested to the recent Senate inquiry by the South Australian Centre for Economic Studies was $80 to $120 per week, enough to restore it to where it was relation to other benefits in the early 1990s. Some Senators wedded to low JobSeeker But the government will need to get over its seemingly ideological premise that the unemployed are in some way responsible for their own misfortune and are usually undeserving of the support needed to meet living costs. This sentiment on display in the dissenting report by Coalition members of the Labor and Greens dominated inquiry which recommended JobSeeker be increased. In explaining their position in April, after the the government had temporally doubled JobSeeker, Coalition Senators Wendy Askew and Hollie Hughes, argued that a permanent increase could carry with it “disincentive effects in respect of engagement with the workforce”. Read more: When the Coronavirus Supplement stops, JobSeeker needs to increase by $185 a week Put plainly, they were concerned that if JobSeeker was boosted to a reasonable level (as it has been, temporarily) people mightn’t want to work. Yet the transcript of evidence given by treasury officials at the inquiry reveals the department has never been asked to examine that question. Asked whether the treasury had ever done any modelling of an increase in the payment now known as JobSeeker, deputy secretary Jenny Wilkinson relied “no”. Asked again: “You’ve never done that?” she replied “no”. Others have done the analysis. The compromise that might just stick Deloitte Access Economics believes an increase would boost the size of the economy and boost the number of people employed by 12,000. A compromise that might be acceptable to members of the Coalition who oppose lifting JobSeeker but support “job-ready” training programs, might be an increase in the JobSeeker allowance of, say, $80 per week, split into two. Half of the increase would be a cash increase without conditions, the other half would be provided for accredited training. With conditions in place to ensure participation in bona fide training, the increase could drive the skills development both employers and the unemployed want. Read more: The government is making ‘job-ready’ degrees cheaper for students – but cutting funding to the same courses The training that would emerge would be market-driven, responding to the post-COVID-19 needs of employers and potential employees. The Productivity Commission has implicitly endorsed such an approach, reporting in May that there was “a manifest capacity to better allocate the $6.1 billion in government spending on vocational education and training to improve outcomes”. JobSeeker could help, both supporting Australians who are out of work and supporting them to get back into work.

Authors: The Conversation

Read more https://theconversation.com/the-compromise-that-might-just-boost-the-jobseeker-unemployment-benefit-142321

Cyberspace is critical infrastructure – it will take effective government oversight to make it safe

Cyberspace has become indispensable during the COVID-19 pandemic, heightening the need for online protections.Ariel Skelley/DigitalVision via Getty ImagesA famous 1990s New Yorker cartoon showed two dogs at a computer and...

¿Por qué algunos estadounidenses parecen más 'estadounidenses' que otros?

Las nobles nociones igualitarias sobre la ciudadanía no siempre se sostienenAP Photo/Charlie NeibergallEn Estados Unidos y en muchos otros países, la nacionalidad se define por un conjun...

Katherine Kinzler, Professor of Psychology, University of Chicago - avatar Katherine Kinzler, Professor of Psychology, University of Chicago

Controversias en la investigación del coronavirus muestran que la ciencia está funcionando como debería

Un paper de alto perfil sobre los riesgos del medicamento antimalárico hidroxicloriquina fue retirado en junio.AP Photo/John Locher,Varios artículos de alto perfil sobre la investigaci&o...

Mark R. O'Brian, Professor and Chair of Biochemistry, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York - avatar Mark R. O'Brian, Professor and Chair of Biochemistry, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

How COVID-19 might increase risk of memory loss and cognitive decline

More and more studies are revealing the cognitive effects of COVID-19.Amornrat Phuchom / Getty ImagesOf all frightening ways that the SARS-COV-2 virus affects the body, one of the more insidious is th...

Natalie C. Tronson, Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Michigan - avatar Natalie C. Tronson, Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Michigan

Why New York is suing the NRA: 4 questions answered

The suit alleges improprieties by Wayne LaPierre and other current and former NRA officials. Scott Olson/Getty ImagesEditor’s note: New York state Attorney General Letitia James is suing the Na...

Brian Mittendorf, Fisher Designated Professor of Accounting, The Ohio State University - avatar Brian Mittendorf, Fisher Designated Professor of Accounting, The Ohio State University

Lost your job due to coronavirus? Artificial intelligence could be your best friend in finding a new one

Some places are still hiring.AP Photo/Lynne SladkyMillions of Americans are unemployed and looking for work. Hiring continues, but there’s far more demand for jobs than supply. As scholars of h...

Stewart Black, Professor of Management Practice in Global Leadership and Strategy, INSEAD - avatar Stewart Black, Professor of Management Practice in Global Leadership and Strategy, INSEAD