4 Reasons Why You Might Struggle To Make A Profit In Your Business

So...how profitable is your business? We hope you are making a success of your operation, but if you are barely making a profit, or if (dare we say it) making more losses than financial gains, then...

News Company - avatar News Company

Inducing consumer paralysis: how retailers bury customers in an avalanche of choice

Three decades of behavioural experiments show consumers given too many choices are more likely to make a bad or no choice.www.shutterstock.comDo you think you are paying more than you should for energ...

The Conversation - avatar The Conversation

Quantum physics experiment shows Heisenberg was right about uncertainty, in a certain sense

Quantum particles are not really just particles... they are also waves.Shutterstock/agsandrewThe word uncertainty is used a lot in quantum mechanics. One school of thought is that this means there&rsq...

Howard Wiseman, Director, Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University - avatar Howard Wiseman, Director, Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University

Setka furore opens division within the labour movement – and there is no easy solution

Setka has form in attracting negative media attention as Victorian state secretary of the Construction, Forestry, Mining, Maritime and Energy Union.AAP/Daniel PockettJohn Setka’s reported commen...

Ray Markey, Emeritus Professor, Macquarie University - avatar Ray Markey, Emeritus Professor, Macquarie University

VIDEO: Michelle Grattan on John Setka, press freedom, Adani approval and tax

Opposition leader Anthony Albanese has called for John Setka to be expelled from the Labor Party.AAP/Bianca de MarchiMichelle Grattan talks with University of Canberra Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Built like buildings, boab trees are life-savers with a chequered past

A boab tree in the Kimberley. Boab trees can live for thousands of years and their trunks hollow out as they get older. ShutterstockSign up to the Beating Around the Bush newsletter here, and suggest ...

Gregory Moore, Doctor of Botany, University of Melbourne - avatar Gregory Moore, Doctor of Botany, University of Melbourne

Proposal to mine fossil-rich site in New Zealand sparks campaign to protect it

Foulden Maar formed 23 million years ago and contains tens of thousands of fossils of extinct plants and animals.Supplied, CC BY-NDAn Australian company’s application to mine a fossil-rich site ...

Nic Rawlence, Lecturer in Ancient DNA, University of Otago - avatar Nic Rawlence, Lecturer in Ancient DNA, University of Otago

'People felt totally trapped': what it's like to be a pensioner renting privately as Australia's housing costs soar

Older private renters are far more likely to experience loneliness than their counterparts in social housing and that loneliness can be acute.ShutterstockA growing number of older Australians don&rsqu...

Sunanda Creagh, Head of Digital Storytelling - avatar Sunanda Creagh, Head of Digital Storytelling

How a cyber attack hampered Hong Kong protesters

Massive public protests taking place in Hong Kong over the past week are aimed at a new extradition law, known as the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance, that would see accused criminals extradited to mainl...

Stanley Shanapinda, Research Fellow, La Trobe University - avatar Stanley Shanapinda, Research Fellow, La Trobe University

Research Check: is white meat as bad for your cholesterol levels as red meat?

Whether you're eating red meat or white meat, a lean cut is the healthier way to go.From shutterstock.comYou’ve probably heard eating too much fatty red meat is bad for your health, while lean m...

Clare Collins, Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Newcastle - avatar Clare Collins, Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Newcastle

Inside the story: the all-knowing narrator in Kim Scott's Taboo

View from a highway rest stop east of Ravensthorpe, Western Australia. In Kim Scott's Taboo, the landscape becomes a narrator.Chris Fithall/flickr, CC BYWhy do we tell stories, and how are they crafte...

Julienne van Loon, Vice Chancellor's Principal Research Fellow, School of Media & Communication, RMIT University - avatar Julienne van Loon, Vice Chancellor's Principal Research Fellow, School of Media & Communication, RMIT University

Adani is cleared to start digging its coal mine – six key questions answered

There is now nothing standing between Indian mining giant Adani and the coal buried in Queensland’s Galilee Basin.By approving the Adani’s groundwater management plan on June 13, the Queen...

Adrian Werner, Professor of Hydrogeology, Flinders University - avatar Adrian Werner, Professor of Hydrogeology, Flinders University

Vital Signs: the RBA's marching orders are no longer realistic. They'll have to change

Every few years, the government hands the Reserve Bank a new set of instructions.ShutterstockA somewhat obscure fact about the marching orders for Australia’s Reserve Bank is that, usually, when...

Richard Holden, Professor of Economics, UNSW - avatar Richard Holden, Professor of Economics, UNSW

Friday essay: Barry Humphries' humour is now history – that's the fate of topical, satirical comedy

Dame Edna Everage at Melbourne Town Hall in 2006 after being presented with the Key to the City. Simon Mossman/AAPLet’s face it, Thursday evenings on ABC television are not quite the same any mo...

Anne Pender, Professor, University of New England - avatar Anne Pender, Professor, University of New England

imageDaniel Andrews and his ministers swear an oath to comply with the law, which includes the obligations of public office as a public trust.AAP/Julian Smith

There cannot be a more important office or more challenging role than being a member of parliament. This is especially so for government MPs and ministers, including the newly elected Victorian ministry sworn in on Thursday. As former federal Liberal minister Fred Chaney has explained, all persons elected to parliament bring with them values, loyalties and obligations to self, family and other supporters, and their parties, but also obligations to people in their electorate and the state – not to mention personal political ambitions and the pursuit of power. Much of the time, two or more of them will be in conflict.

Cabinet ministers have to add to the mix their loyalty and confidentiality obligations. Chaney observed that most decisions of policy that MPs and cabinet ministers must make involve issues for which there are competing solutions, none perfect, which will affect members of the community differently.

Chaney advised that the guiding principle to resolve conflicts must be what is in the public interest.

Public office is a public trust

The oaths politicians take as MPs and ministers commit them to compliance with the law but give little guidance. Guidance from the law can be found in a principle of law and ethics, which states that public office is a public trust. Regrettably, that principle has been largely forgotten.

Victorian MPs and ministers are covered by two codes of conduct. However, these focus on specific issues of conflicts of interest between their personal financial interests and public duties and roles in parliament and government.

Guidance could be found in the current benchmark for codes, the Commonwealth Standards of Ministerial Ethics, initially published by former prime minister Kevin Rudd. The code begins by stating:

1.1. The ethical standards required of Ministers in Australia’s system of government reflect the fact that, as holders of public office, Ministers are entrusted with considerable privilege and wide discretionary power.

1.2. In recognition that public office is a public trust, therefore, the people of Australia are entitled to expect that, as a matter of principle, Ministers will act with due regard for integrity, fairness, accountability, responsibility and the public interest, as required by these Standards.

While expressly based on the public trust principle, it does not appear to have revived that principle in the consciousness of those in government or the community.

When we entrust people with power over our lives, that power should be exercised in our interests; that obligation must always prevail over the interests of the people given the power. This is what the law recognises as a fiduciary relationship.

It follows that when a minister is making a decision and the common good of the people requires one decision, but his or her personal or political loyalties and future require a different decision, he or she must always give priority to the common good.

An ancient principle fallen into disrepair

This is not a new principle. It goes back to Plato.

About 100 years ago, that proposition that “public office is a public trust” was regularly used in public discussion of government and parliamentarians’ actions. It is not a metaphor: it is a fundamental ethical principle and a principle of the common law of Australia.

Former High Court chief justice Sir Gerard Brennan explained:

It has long been an established legal principle that a member of Parliament holds ‘a fiduciary relation towards the public’ and ‘undertakes and has imposed upon him a public duty and a public trust’. The duties of a public trustee are not identical with the duties of a private trustee but there is an analogous limitation imposed on the conduct of the trustee in both categories. The limitation demands that all decisions and exercises of power be taken in the interests of the beneficiaries and that duty cannot be subordinated to, or qualified by, the interests of the trustee.

Sir Gerard acknowledged that:

… the fiduciary duties of political officers are often impossible to enforce judicially - the motivations for political action are often complex – but that does not negate the fiduciary nature of political duty.

Sir Gerard’s conclusion left little room for doubt about the obligations of public trust:

Power, whether legislative or executive, is reposed in members of the Parliament by the public for exercise in the interests of the public and not primarily for the interests of members or the parties to which they belong. The cry ‘whatever it takes’ is not consistent with the performance of fiduciary duty.

The courts have applied the legal principle in other areas. These include legality of contracts, common law criminal offences and the sentencing of convicted offenders whose offence involved a breach of their public trust obligations.

The courts have also applied the principle when interpreting legislation that gives discretionary statutory powers to ministers. The courts have held that such powers are “conferred as it were upon trusts”. They are to be exercised in the public interest to promote and not defeat or frustrate the objects of the legislation.

Court action can be taken to challenge the exercise of such powers relying upon the legal principle that public office is a public trust. One example is the powers held by planning ministers to intervene in planning applications.

Issue of integrity affects all policy

imageOpen government, David Cameron has noted, forces the powerful to act in the interests of the whole people.AAP/Dan Peled

In the area of open and accountable government our public trustees – both elected and appointed public servants – inevitably have to deal with a conflict of interest arising from their obligation to give priority to the public interest over their personal and political interests. This is an area of policy that affects how all other policy areas are addressed.

Open and accountable government is critical to the operation of our democracy. If provided, it would also result in better government for the whole community, reduce opportunities for corruption of government and significantly help economic growth. In late 2013, British Prime Minister David Cameron said:

… the best way to ensure that an economy delivers long-term success, and that success is felt by all of its people, is to have it overseen by political institutions in which everyone can share. Where governments are the servants of the people, not the masters. Where close tabs are kept on the powerful and where the powerful are forced to act in the interests of the whole people, not a narrow clique.

He acknowledged that transparency in government is not easy, that it “brings risks”. The risks are personal for our public trustees. Giving priority to the public interest by strengthening open and accountable government requires moral courage.

Probably the best-known recent failure in the government integrity system in Victoria has been the creation of the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). If the creators of IBAC had been more aware of their obligations as public trustees, would the outcome have been different?

Would they have dealt with the conflict of interest they faced by including the community in the decision-making process, publishing draft legislation for discussion and involving relevant civil society groups in their deliberations? Instead, they lacked, at every critical stage, the benefit of input from the key stakeholders – the people of Victoria.

How do we all repair government?

The new Labor government made election commitments to strengthen the state’s integrity system. While their proposals, if carried out well, will make some important incremental improvements, much more could have been promised. For example, the government could replace our FOI legislation with the best-practice “Right to Know” approach of Queensland and refer the political funding of parties and candidates to the Joint Electoral Matters Committee for inquiry.

Again, did a failure to properly consider the public trust principle contribute to the shortcomings of what has been promised? If so, that can be easily rectified.

In his victory speech on election night, new Victorian premier spoke in terms that reflected the public trust principle when he identified two key objectives of his new government: serving the people and winning back their trust.

The government can win back people’s trust by demonstrating that it is serious about strengthening Victoria’s integrity system by implementing Australian best practice. There is no better way to serve the people and regain their trust than bringing them into the decision-making process on all integrity-related issues.

To change the culture to one that accepts and gives primacy to the public trust principle, it needs to become an accepted part of public discussion and expectation. Where does responsibility for this lie? The short answer is with us all: members of the community; the teaching professions; governments; parliaments and the media.

Ultimately, however, the buck stops with those who vote every four years. If we want our democracy to work as it should, we cannot afford to disengage from it. And if we continue our disengagement, we must accept ultimate responsibility for the failures of our democratic system.

Is there hope? The rise of these matters as a political issue in Victoria and at the national and international level suggest there is. Australia has made commitments under the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and through the G20 and the Open Government Partnership.

And as Victor Hugo said:

All the forces in the world are not so powerful as an idea whose time has come.

The public trust principle’s time is here.


Tim Smith QC was one of the authors of this article. He chairs the Accountability Round Table and is a former Supreme Court judge and former commissioner of the Australian Legal Reform Commission and Victorian Legal Reform Commission. More of his speeches and writing on this issue can be seen here.

image

Colleen Lewis has previously received funding from the Australian Research Council. She is a member of the Accountability Round Table.

Read more http://theconversation.com/politicians-forget-what-public-trust-means-we-must-remind-them-34981