Most Used Tips On How To Choose The Best Steak

The steak. Almost a staple in our diets. However, not all steaks are created equal, there are those delicious steaks, and then there are the godly tasting steaks. Knowing the subtle differences can me...

News Company - avatar News Company

3 Tips for Improving Your Physical Fitness, When You're Starting from a Pretty Bad Place

Fitness is one of the most important things in life for overall health and wellness – and maintaining a regular fitness routine has all sorts of potential benefits, ranging from better medical outco...

News Company - avatar News Company

Top 5 Events to Enjoy in the United Kingdom Every Year

The United Kingdom as any country holds numerous engaging festivals throughout the year. What makes the UK offer to stand out from the rest is their exciting travel landmarks and cities that nearly ...

Goran Kezić - avatar Goran Kezić

Friday essay: YouTube apologies and reality TV revelations - the rise of the public confession

A little over a year ago, former Australian cricket captain Steve Smith made a tearful confession and apology to the public, having been banned from cricket for 12 months for ball tampering. Smith&rsq...

Kate Douglas, Professor, Flinders University - avatar Kate Douglas, Professor, Flinders University

Population DNA testing for disease risk is coming. Here are five things to know

Screening millions of healthy people for their risk of disease can be cost-effective. But it raises ethical and regulatory concerns.from www.shutterstock.comDNA testing to predict disease risk has the...

Paul Lacaze, Head, Public Health Genomics Program, Monash University - avatar Paul Lacaze, Head, Public Health Genomics Program, Monash University

Why Sydney residents use 30% more water per day than Melburnians

Melbourne's water supplies are running low after years of drought.shutterstockThis week Melbourne’s water storage dropped below 50%, a sign of the prolonged and deepening drought gripping easter...

Ian Wright, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Science, Western Sydney University - avatar Ian Wright, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Science, Western Sydney University

From gun control to HIV: six ingredients of successful public policy

Australia’s national policy response to HIV/AIDS has been lauded as one of the best in the world.ShutterstockIn the lead up to the recent federal election, there was plenty of negative rhetoric ...

Joannah Luetjens, PhD Candidate, Utrecht University - avatar Joannah Luetjens, PhD Candidate, Utrecht University

How the dangerous evolution of Pakistan’s national security state threatens domestic stability

Protests followed the terrorist attack that killed more than 40 Indian military personnel in the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir. AAP/Jaipal Singh, CC BY-NDIn February, a terrorist attack by Jaysh...

Robert G. Patman, Professor of International Relations, University of Otago - avatar Robert G. Patman, Professor of International Relations, University of Otago

Taming wild cities: the tall buildings of Australia show why we need strong design guidelines

Towering canyons of concrete and glass are an increasingly dominant feature of fast-growing cities like Melbourne.ymgerman/ShutterstockPrivate enterprise has shaped the skylines of Australia’s c...

Timothy Moore, PhD Candidate, Melbourne School of Design, Monash University - avatar Timothy Moore, PhD Candidate, Melbourne School of Design, Monash University

Let them play! Kids need freedom from play restrictions to develop

Playing in nature improves children's learning, social and emotional skills.MI PHAM/unsplashYou may have heard of play. It’s that thing children do – the diverse range of unstructured, spo...

Brendon Hyndman, Senior Lecturer and Course Director (Postgraduate Education courses), Charles Sturt University - avatar Brendon Hyndman, Senior Lecturer and Course Director (Postgraduate Education courses), Charles Sturt University

If you think less immigration will solve Australia's problems, you're wrong; but neither will more

More by luck than design, recent recent levels of immigration seem to be in a 'goldilocks zone' that balances economic, social and environmental objectives.www.shutterstock.comAre we letting too many ...

Cameron Allen, Researcher, UNSW - avatar Cameron Allen, Researcher, UNSW

Gamers use machine learning to navigate complex video games – but it's not free

Playing Dota 2? You can do better with a little help from machine learning.Shutterstock/hkhtt hj Some of the world’s most popular video games track your activity as you play – but they&rsq...

Ben Egliston, PhD candidate in Media and Communications, University of Sydney - avatar Ben Egliston, PhD candidate in Media and Communications, University of Sydney

Grattan on Friday: Shocked Labor moves on – but to what policy destination?

Bill Shorten has said he likes doing the family shopping, nevertheless Tuesday’s front page picture in The Australian did capture the savagery of changing political fortunes. There was Shorten, ...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Narendra Modi has won the largest election in the world. What will this mean for India?

Narendra Modi's image was ubiquitous on the campaign trail – a sign of how much Indians have gravitated toward his cult of personality and nationalist rhetoric.Harish Tyagi/AAP The resounding vi...

Amitabh Mattoo, Honorary Professor of International Relations, University of Melbourne - avatar Amitabh Mattoo, Honorary Professor of International Relations, University of Melbourne

imageZero tolerance is a faith and not a policy.Creativity103/Flickr, CC BY-SA

According to the UK government’s “first evidence-based study”, released at the end of last week, tough laws for personal possession of illicit drugs fail to lower levels of their use. This is not news to anyone who has spent any time looking into the social cost of the “war on drugs”, so what is the purpose of these laws?

After 50 years of drug prohibition, we know our current regulatory structure is a catastrophic failure. We also know that what is sometimes called “harm minimisation” has been remarkably successful in reducing deaths from drug overdose, levels of HIV infection in the population of intravenous drug users, and so on.

But the “zero tolerance” approach to illicit drugs continues to hold sway, most notably in the United States. And through the international drug control treaty system that gives signatories little freedom to go their own way.

The puzzle is why political hostility to harm minimisation is still so dogmatically entrenched. When our friends and family behave irrationally, acting in self-destructive ways, in the end we stop trying to reason with them and send them to an analyst. It is their irrational impulses that need to be understood.

So it is with law. It’s time to reassess what drug laws are “for” if we’re to understand why they have proven so hard to change.

Anxieties about race

Drug laws came into existence not as a response to a regulatory need but as a manifestation of anxiety.

In the early years of the 20th century, what had previously been a question of habit, pleasure, or shame, became branded as criminal. The crime of possession came, in time, to define drugs: a “drug” was that which could not be legally possessed; if it could be, then it was not a drug at all, but a medicine, a drink, or a smoke.

Initially, racial anxieties lay behind these new distinctions. The first laws against drug possession were enacted around 1900, in the United States and Australia, Canada and South Africa. These laws, which formed the template and precedent on which all later “narcotic drugs acts” were built, focused exclusively on one form of one drug: “opium suitable for smoking”.

imageThe first drug laws focused exclusively on one form of one drug: ‘opium suitable for smoking’. From the Illustrated London News, 1 August 1874/Wikimedia Commons

Pharmaceutically, this made no sense (why not ban other forms of opium?). But the Chinese were associated with opium smoking, and all the countries that led the rush to prohibition had large and poorly assimilated Chinese minorities.

The stories that circulated in newspapers and magazines at the end of the 19th century consistently imagined opium as an agent of seduction. The Chinese dealer is invariably depicted as a trafficker in young white women, and opium is the trick that preys on her innocence.

Here’s one example from The Bulletin, in 1886:

One of the girls now kept in a den on the Rocks, says … ‘I went to … place when I was only about 16 because he used to give me presents. He then wanted me to smoke, but I never would, because the pipes looked so dirty. But one day he put a new pipe before me, and made it ready, and after the first whiff from it, he or any other man …. I was completely at their mercy, but so help me God I was a good girl before that.

In Australia at that time, questions of racial identity assumed particular importance. The fear of sexual relationships between Chinese and white Australians encapsulated anxieties that led to discrimination, exclusion, racism, violence, riots, and murders.

In this respect, opium was a useful device. It relieved “white girls” of responsibility for their actions. Though they might be punished for taking opium, the treatment of the drug itself as the active principle allowed them – and society itself – to remain innocent.

The parallel with the witchcraft laws of a much earlier time is uncanny. The role of “possession” is similar in both.

First, it provides a causal explanation for unacceptable social behaviour. Whether as an occasion for punishment or for treatment, the person is not responsible for their behaviour; the drug – or the devil – “made them do it”. Neither is society responsible for the punishment; rather it’s the drug itself that is being exorcised.

What’s more, it provides physical proof of invisible demons. The legal possession of a drug offers physical evidence of an evil that’s otherwise entirely psychological. The witches’ sexual possession, and their possession of others, likewise provided the sole physical evidence of the reality of the demon world.

imageThe fear of sexual relationships between Chinese and white Australians encapsulated anxieties that led to the development of drug laws .UnklNik/Flickr, CC BY

It’s hardly coincidental that the legal category of crimen exceptum recognised the need to abandon normal standards of legal proof in certain special cases. Its first example were the laws of witchcraft; its main modern examples are our drug laws, with their deeming and reverse onus provisions.

Performing prohibition

We live in a time of enormous social anxiety, though now of course our fears are less simply focused on questions of race. Drug laws continue to relieve these anxieties by dramatising them, giving them a public shape and creating public scapegoats for social problems.

The standard portrayal of the drug addict – a creation of our drug laws just as much as the traffic in illegal drugs is a creation of those laws – as dulled and incapable, sapped of all will, reassures us of their absolute otherness. The solidity and the certainty of our own idea of society is shored up by vivid contrast with theirs.

The image of the possessed addict paints a picture of a world where night and day are clearly marked, where we are awake and they are asleep. How well such a picture justifies our anxious feelings about the state of the world, and reassures us that we are in no wise responsible for it.

The prohibition of drugs is not an attempt to destroy but rather to perform our anxieties; like a piece of theatre or an act of worship.

In this light, much that seems incomprehensible about the current drug regime becomes clear – particularly its paranoid over-reaction, and its unremitting failure to achieve its so-called purposes.

The battle to eliminate a drug traffic that becomes more profitable the more aggressive our legal response, is devastatingly counter-productive. Every drugs seizure, every boatload or shoot-out, is clearly of only the most trivial significance. But it is presented, by police, lawyers, government, and the media, as an elaborate morality play staged for the cameras.

imageThe legal structure of drug laws is not an attempt to regulate or solve a problem, but on the contrary an attempt to dramatise a world view.Seth Anderson/Flickr, CC BY-SA

This is not simply a sideshow made possible by law, or a consequence of the failure of legal principles to achieve their promised goal. On the contrary, this drama is precisely what drug laws have always and only been “for”, right from the days when it was the ethnic background of users that mattered most.

The function of illegality is not to stamp drugs out, but to make it more public, more dramatic, more theatrical. Drugs serve an object lesson – a lesson in the perils of becoming an object. And the proof of this slavery – its undeniable physical evidence – is made present, once and for all, by users' possession of the drugs that possess them.

The legal structure of drug laws is not an attempt to regulate or solve a problem, but on the contrary an attempt to dramatise a world view. Zero tolerance is a faith and not a policy, a faith at the heart of which lies the importance of social rules, obedience, and respect for the distinctions between right and wrong. And which sees the legal system as an all-powerful arbiter and enforcer of social norms.

Behind that faith lies fear: fear of the consequences of a loss of certainty, fear of a weakened legal capacity, and fear of a “permissive” world in which such bright lines can no longer be drawn.

Such a world is not being brought into existence by drug users themselves; they are merely the puppets forced to play in this theatre of the absurd.

Our politicians do not fear witches: they hope for them. In pursuing and insisting upon this hope, against all the evidence and with ever more shrill and inflexible determination, those who continue to advocate such policies behave, above all, like men possessed.

image

Desmond Manderson does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

Read more http://theconversation.com/like-men-possessed-what-are-illicit-drug-laws-really-for-31739