Most Used Tips On How To Choose The Best Steak

The steak. Almost a staple in our diets. However, not all steaks are created equal, there are those delicious steaks, and then there are the godly tasting steaks. Knowing the subtle differences can me...

News Company - avatar News Company

3 Tips for Improving Your Physical Fitness, When You're Starting from a Pretty Bad Place

Fitness is one of the most important things in life for overall health and wellness – and maintaining a regular fitness routine has all sorts of potential benefits, ranging from better medical outco...

News Company - avatar News Company

Top 5 Events to Enjoy in the United Kingdom Every Year

The United Kingdom as any country holds numerous engaging festivals throughout the year. What makes the UK offer to stand out from the rest is their exciting travel landmarks and cities that nearly ...

Goran Kezić - avatar Goran Kezić

Friday essay: YouTube apologies and reality TV revelations - the rise of the public confession

A little over a year ago, former Australian cricket captain Steve Smith made a tearful confession and apology to the public, having been banned from cricket for 12 months for ball tampering. Smith&rsq...

Kate Douglas, Professor, Flinders University - avatar Kate Douglas, Professor, Flinders University

Population DNA testing for disease risk is coming. Here are five things to know

Screening millions of healthy people for their risk of disease can be cost-effective. But it raises ethical and regulatory concerns.from www.shutterstock.comDNA testing to predict disease risk has the...

Paul Lacaze, Head, Public Health Genomics Program, Monash University - avatar Paul Lacaze, Head, Public Health Genomics Program, Monash University

Why Sydney residents use 30% more water per day than Melburnians

Melbourne's water supplies are running low after years of drought.shutterstockThis week Melbourne’s water storage dropped below 50%, a sign of the prolonged and deepening drought gripping easter...

Ian Wright, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Science, Western Sydney University - avatar Ian Wright, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Science, Western Sydney University

From gun control to HIV: six ingredients of successful public policy

Australia’s national policy response to HIV/AIDS has been lauded as one of the best in the world.ShutterstockIn the lead up to the recent federal election, there was plenty of negative rhetoric ...

Joannah Luetjens, PhD Candidate, Utrecht University - avatar Joannah Luetjens, PhD Candidate, Utrecht University

How the dangerous evolution of Pakistan’s national security state threatens domestic stability

Protests followed the terrorist attack that killed more than 40 Indian military personnel in the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir. AAP/Jaipal Singh, CC BY-NDIn February, a terrorist attack by Jaysh...

Robert G. Patman, Professor of International Relations, University of Otago - avatar Robert G. Patman, Professor of International Relations, University of Otago

Taming wild cities: the tall buildings of Australia show why we need strong design guidelines

Towering canyons of concrete and glass are an increasingly dominant feature of fast-growing cities like Melbourne.ymgerman/ShutterstockPrivate enterprise has shaped the skylines of Australia’s c...

Timothy Moore, PhD Candidate, Melbourne School of Design, Monash University - avatar Timothy Moore, PhD Candidate, Melbourne School of Design, Monash University

Let them play! Kids need freedom from play restrictions to develop

Playing in nature improves children's learning, social and emotional skills.MI PHAM/unsplashYou may have heard of play. It’s that thing children do – the diverse range of unstructured, spo...

Brendon Hyndman, Senior Lecturer and Course Director (Postgraduate Education courses), Charles Sturt University - avatar Brendon Hyndman, Senior Lecturer and Course Director (Postgraduate Education courses), Charles Sturt University

If you think less immigration will solve Australia's problems, you're wrong; but neither will more

More by luck than design, recent recent levels of immigration seem to be in a 'goldilocks zone' that balances economic, social and environmental objectives.www.shutterstock.comAre we letting too many ...

Cameron Allen, Researcher, UNSW - avatar Cameron Allen, Researcher, UNSW

Gamers use machine learning to navigate complex video games – but it's not free

Playing Dota 2? You can do better with a little help from machine learning.Shutterstock/hkhtt hj Some of the world’s most popular video games track your activity as you play – but they&rsq...

Ben Egliston, PhD candidate in Media and Communications, University of Sydney - avatar Ben Egliston, PhD candidate in Media and Communications, University of Sydney

Grattan on Friday: Shocked Labor moves on – but to what policy destination?

Bill Shorten has said he likes doing the family shopping, nevertheless Tuesday’s front page picture in The Australian did capture the savagery of changing political fortunes. There was Shorten, ...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Narendra Modi has won the largest election in the world. What will this mean for India?

Narendra Modi's image was ubiquitous on the campaign trail – a sign of how much Indians have gravitated toward his cult of personality and nationalist rhetoric.Harish Tyagi/AAP The resounding vi...

Amitabh Mattoo, Honorary Professor of International Relations, University of Melbourne - avatar Amitabh Mattoo, Honorary Professor of International Relations, University of Melbourne

imageWill the feds raid this Christmas tree? Rick Wilking/Reuters

Abraham Lincoln said that those who shape public opinion exert an even greater influence than judges and lawmakers.

In recent years popular sentiment – on issues like marriage equality and legalization of medical marijuana – has molded law and policy in its own image. On the horizon is growing support for physician aid in dying and a deeper personal stake in end of life decisions. Each of these initiatives has been cultivated at the state level, often in the face of rigid federal government rejection of favorable social and scientific evidence.

State and federal conflicts are not new, but rarely has the US government displayed more intransigence than in the arena of marijuana prohibition.

Inventing the marijuana menace

In the 1930s, the first chief of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics Harry J. Anslinger devised a rabid campaign against the cannabis menace. Perceiving marijuana use to be the province of unsavory types like poor blacks, jazz enthusiasts and bohemians of loose morals, he linked it to heroin addiction, madness and mayhem.

In 1944, a report commissioned by New York’s Mayor Fiorello La Guardia determined that cannabis use did not promote opiate dependence, deviant behavior or psychosis in otherwise healthy individuals. Anslinger fiercely condemned the findings and continued business as usual.

In 1973 a report by the federally authorized Shafer Commission proved equally ineffective in deterring President Richard Nixon’s War on Drugs. Concluding that the social and financial cost of criminalizing marijuana use was disproportionate to the drug’s harm, the commission recommended treatment and prevention over rampant prosecution.

Today, Congress and the Drug Enforcement Administration persist, despite evidence to the contrary, in classifying marijuana in the Controlled Substances Act as a Schedule I drug with no medical benefits. At the same time, the US Government continues to obstruct scientific research efforts by restricting access to cannabis supplies - it’s hard to source something that is illegal.

At the same time, fears that legalization will promote underage use have so far, it seems, proved unfounded.

As to the effect of Colorado’s 2012 legalization of personal cannabis use on crime, traffic accidents and educational and health outcomes, the data is still coming in. Evidence of legalization’s impact on traffic accidents is contradictory and its effect on crime rates is anything but conclusive. And, while moderate cannabis use by healthy adults seems to pose minimal risk, the effect of the drug on young, developing brains may prove more problematic.

Yet blanket federal prohibition dictates that a rational assessment of legal marijuana regulation will never see the light of day. Without the reality testing provided by state initiatives, we would be forced to rely on data furnished by federal agencies, entities that have, historically, skewed public perception as to marijuana’s inherent risks.

Even anti-drug activists support the notion of the states as laboratories, if only to see legalization experiments crash and burn.

Two governments, one people: the federalism dilemma

We learned this in high school civics, but we often forget that it matters: every American is a citizen of two governments, the federal and the state.

Congress can only trump our state governments when the US Constitution says so. Very often it does not, and governments in tension are the hallmark of our constitutional order. They have never been at each other’s throats as in the current marijuana debate.

In 2005, the Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. Raich decision held that the Constitution’s “Supremacy Clause” meant that the DEA could enforce the federal law criminalizing all marijuana possession or distribution in states that allowed it. But, at the same time, the Court did not overturn the many state laws that legalize and regulate marijuana.

The result is that marijuana is everywhere illegal and yet legal in nearly half the states. How can this Zen-like status be resolved?

The short answer is that it cannot unless either the federal or state governments give up. A majority of Americans favor the legalization of marijuana, and the movement in the states is growing in strength. Oregon, Alaska, and Washington, DC approved legalization in November, and more ballot initiatives are planned for 2016. So far, however, Congress has repelled every effort to remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act.

But it’s not really an evenly matched fight. The enforcement of drug laws in the United States is overwhelmingly a state matter. Federal resources are minuscule in comparison. For the average pot smoker in one of the states that has legalized either medical or recreational marijuana, the fear of arrest is very small. The federal government is responsible for only 2% of all drug arrests nationwide. (In 2013, there were 1,552,432 arrests for drug law violations in the US. That same year, there were 30,688 drug arrests by the DEA. )

What’s more, the federal government is not sure what it wants. The Department of Justice -— the federal agency charged with prosecuting marijuana cases -— has adopted shifting positions in view of the growing revolt by the states. The Attorney General and several US Attorneys have insisted on their right to authorize DEA raids on cannabis dispensaries and to prosecute all marijuana cases, even while issuing pronouncements suggesting accommodation with state efforts to legalize and regulate marijuana.

This wavering suggests an internal struggle within the federal government on how to deal with the marijuana revolution.

In the meantime, the legal situation around the country is chaotic. While medical marijuana is legal in almost half the states, in no state may physicians prescribe this drug without risking loss of their federal license to prescribe narcotics. State laws have tried to bypass that problem by accepting a doctor’s “recommendation.” But even if a doctor could write a cannabis prescription, no pharmacy could fill it without violating federal law.

Marijuana businesses may comply with state law but will run into tax and banking walls erected by the federal government. The Internal Revenue Service has ruled that companies in the business of dispensing marijuana may not deduct their business expenses as other business do —- a staggering financial penalty. And most banks, fearful of federal regulators, have refused to open commercial accounts for cannabis dispensaries, thus relegating these businesses to a hazardous cash-only operation.

Let the states experiment

The federal government should listen to the same popular voices that the states have heard. Marijuana is a drug of choice for millions, which like alcohol may be used moderately or abused. But for those afflicted with the many serious illnesses for which marijuana supplies substantial relief, it is a drug of compassion.

We need a strong central government, but not one that assumes the role of moral guardian at the expense of credibility. Our federal government functions best —- and it has succeeded phenomenally well -— when it keeps its ideals in sight without obscuring the practicalities. On the issue of marijuana’s dangers, the federal government has cried wolf once too often.

You can’t fool all of the people, and all of the states, all of the time.

This piece was co-authored by Ruth C Stern, an independent legal researcher and scholar


J Herbie DiFonzo does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

Read more